Facing the Fire
It is one-sided in that it doesn't critique Gish in any way, even though there is plenty of criticism to be made about Gish's presentation as well as Plimer's.
The documentary ends by pointing you to CMI's website--I'll point you to the Talk.Origins website.
UPDATE: This web page at the Talk.Origins website points out that Plimer was correct in his criticisms of Gish's booklet. The ICR did finally update and correct that booklet around 1994, meaning they continued to sell a booklet which made false claims for nearly a decade after they knew that to be the case.
UPDATE (January 1, 2009): You can see the "Facing the Fire" video yourself here.
Posts
2 comments:
Plimer has just written a book Heaven and Earth: Global Warming: The Missing Science:
"The hypothesis that humans can actually change climate is unsupported by evidence from geology, archaeology, history and astronomy. The hypothesis is rejected.
"A new ignorance fills the yawning spiritual gap in Western society. Climate change politics is religious fundamentalism masquerading as science. Its triumph is computer models unrelated to observations in nature. There has been no critical due diligence of the science of climate change, dogma dominates, sceptics are pilloried and 17th Century thinking promotes prophets of doom, guilt and penance."
Václav Klaus, President of the Czech Republic as well as the EU, 2009 gives it a glowing recommendation:
"He also convincingly criticizes the UN, the IPCC, UK and US politicians as well as “Hollywood show business celebrities”. He strictly distinguishes science and environmental activism, politics and opportunism. The book I wrote two years ago “Blue Planet in Green Shackles” comes to very similar conclusions but I have to say that if I’d had a chance to read Professor Plimer’s book, my book would have been better."
Has the quality of his criticism improved?
Tim Lambert at the Deltoid blog has occasionally raked Plimer over the coals for misrepresentations about climate change.
Post a Comment