Painfully Unfunny
This show comes off like something Kevin Trudeau should be involved with, somehow.
Posted by
Einzige
at
2/17/2007 07:16:00 AM
4
comments
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/16/2007 11:54:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: creationism, intelligent design, Richard Sternberg affair
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/15/2007 03:57:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: politics
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/14/2007 08:17:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: politics
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/14/2007 07:50:00 AM
1 comments
Labels: technology
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/13/2007 07:22:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: finance, law, lottery winners and losers
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/13/2007 08:31:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: censorship, copyright, economics, security, spam, technology

Posted by
Lippard
at
2/12/2007 08:11:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: economics, politics, security, technology
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/10/2007 08:33:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: Arizona, economics, minimum wage
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/10/2007 07:46:00 AM
1 comments
Labels: civil liberties, law
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/09/2007 09:19:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: finance, Robert Kiyosaki, technology, The Simple Dollar
But AiG's Mark Looy says "Ken is not upset."Christian publisher Ken Ham said Maher showed up unannounced this week to videotape an interview with him at Ham's Creation Museum, which is just south of Cincinnati. The $25 million facility, due to open in the spring, tells visitors that the earth is just a few thousand years old and that Adam and Eve lived among the dinosaurs.
Ham said a camera crew arranged a Monday visit to the museum, but he was not told that it was connected with Maher, host of HBO's "Real Time with Bill Maher."
"They sneaked Bill Maher into the building while I was waiting for an interview," Ham wrote in a blog he maintains on the Web site of his publishing company, Answers in Genesis.
Maher visited the museum for a documentary he's been filming on religion, his publicist, Sarah Fuller, said Friday. She said he's traveled throughout the U.S. and Europe for the project.
"He's been all over the place," she said. Fuller said she wasn't familiar with how the interview with Ham was conducted.
Ham called Maher's visit an "elaborate deception." He said the film crew asked for a one-on-one interview with Ham after a tour of the museum. After the tour, crew members asked for permission to bring some camera equipment in through the back of the building. Ham wrote that the crew drove to the rear, then distracted an employee as Maher ducked into the building.
Ham said he was shocked, but agreed to the interview.
"Bill Maher did interview me; though respectful in one sense, most of his questions were just mocking attacks on God's word," Ham wrote in the blog on Wednesday.
Ham declined on Friday to comment further on Maher's visit.
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/09/2007 07:12:00 PM
10
comments
Labels: Answers in Genesis, Bill Maher, creationism
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/09/2007 05:20:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: David Paszkiewicz, law, religion
"We advocate the continued use of DRM," Bronfman said, adding that music deserves the same anti-piracy protections as software, TV broadcasts, video games and other forms of intellectual property. "We will not abandon DRM nor services that are successfully implementing DRM for both content and consumers."This quote appeared in an article reporting Warner's dismal results:
its fiscal first-quarter profit fell 74% because of fewer album releases and soft domestic and European sales. Its shares fell nearly 6%.The competition at EMI, however, feels differently:
The New York-based recording company said net income for the period that ended Dec. 31 declined to $18 million, or 12 cents a share, from $69 million, or 46 cents, a year earlier. Revenue fell 11% to $928 million.
Music label EMI Group is in talks to release a large portion of its music catalog for Web sales without technological protections against piracy that are included in most music bought over the Internet now, sources said on Thursday.EMI's plans apparently include talks with Shawn Fanning's SnoCap about releasing MP3-format music through MySpace.
...
One source familiar with the matter said that EMI was in talks to release a large amount of its music in an unprotected MP3 format to various online retailers.
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/09/2007 10:35:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: copyright, economics, security, technology
Hooray you are an atheist with respect to most or all gods. Good work. Hope you aren't disbelieving in the wrong one...
Am I An Atheist
Create a Quiz
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/09/2007 10:05:00 AM
1 comments
Labels: atheism, religion, silly quiz
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/09/2007 09:31:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: copyright, economics, technology
[Conceptual] artist Jonathon Keats has digitally generated a span of silence, four minutes and thirty-three seconds in length, portable enough to be carried on a cellphone. His silent ringtone… is expected to bring quiet to the lives of millions of cellphone users, as well as those close to them.Given the duration of the ringtone, Keats should expect to get sued by the estate of John Cage for copyright infringement.
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/07/2007 06:39:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: copyright, economics, technology
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/07/2007 06:25:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: Arizona, John McCain, law, politics, security, technology
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/07/2007 07:00:00 AM
2
comments
Proposal 2 is Only about marriage. Marriage is a union between husband and wife. Proposal 2 will keep it that way. This is not about rights or benefits or how people choose to live their lives. This has to do with family, children and the way people are. It merely settles the question once and for all what marriage is-for families today and future generations.The Alliance Defense Fund, which backed the similar constitutional amendment here in Arizona, has made similar statements.
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/05/2007 03:22:00 PM
1 comments
Labels: Arizona, creationism, gay marriage, intelligent design, law, religion
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/04/2007 05:09:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: animal rescue, animals
| Probation Type: SUMMARY | Granted: 05/30/2007 | Expire: 05/29/2010 |
| SUMMARY PROBATION GRANTED FOR A PERIOD OF 36 MONTHS, UNDER THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS: | |||
| 1) | OBEY ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, AND COURT ORDERS. | ||
| 2) | BE COMMITTED TO THE CUSTODY OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF FOR 180 DAYS; | ||
| 3) | PAY A FINE AND ASSESSMENT IN THE TOTAL OF $346.00, PAYABLE TO THE COURT, AS DIRECTED BY FINANCIAL SERVICES. | ||
| 4) | PAY VICTIM RESTITUTION, TO BE DETERMINED BY FINANCIAL SERVICES; ANY DISPUTE TO BE RESOLVED IN A COURT HEARING. PAY RESTITUTION (VICTIM) IN AN AMOUNT DETERMINED BY AND PAYABLE TO THE COURT, AS DIRECTED BY FINANCIAL SVCS; ANY DISPUTE TO BE RESOLVED IN A COURT HRG | ||
| 5) | NOT HAVE ANY NEGATIVE CONTACT WITH ANY MEMBER OF THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY. | ||
| 6) | ADDED TERM: DONT KNOWINGLY COME WITHIN 1000FT OF ANY | ||
| 7) | ADDED TERM: DONT ANNOY OR HARASS ANY MEMBER OF CHURCH OF | ||
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/04/2007 04:16:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: Arizona, law, religion, Scientology
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/04/2007 12:12:00 PM
1 comments
Whoever possesses, transports, uses or places or causes another to knowingly or unknowingly possess, transport, use or place any hoax device or hoax substance with the intent to cause anxiety, unrest, fear or personal discomfort to any person or group of persons shall be punished by imprisonment in a house of correction for not more than two and one-half years or by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than five years or by a fine of not more than $5,000, or by both such fine and imprisonment.Note the requirement of intent, which should be impossible to prove--it's clear the intent was to promote the Aqua Teen Hunger Force movie, not to cause panic. But this law also requires that the object being planted be a "hoax device," which is defined as:
For the purposes of this section, the term “hoax device” shall mean any device that would cause a person reasonably to believe that such device is an infernal machine. For the purposes of this section, the term “infernal machine” shall mean any device for endangering life or doing unusual damage to property, or both, by fire or explosion, whether or not contrived to ignite or explode automatically. For the purposes of this section, the words “hoax substance” shall mean any substance that would cause a person reasonably to believe that such substance is a harmful chemical or biological agent, a poison, a harmful radioactive substance or any other substance for causing serious bodily injury, endangering life or doing unusual damage to property, or both.That's a nice term, "infernal machine"--it sounds like something demonic, perhaps appropriate for a state that still has blasphemy laws on the books. Here again, the law is clearly in Beredovsky's favor. There is no way that a person would reasonably believe that the magnetic lights depicting Mooninite characters were "infernal machines"--devices designed to ignite or explode.
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/04/2007 12:02:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: Aqua Teen Hunger Force, hoaxes, law
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/03/2007 02:58:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: philosophy, religion
And so has Tim Lee at the Technology Liberation Front:Now the police look stupid, but they're trying really not hard not to act humiliated:
Governor Deval Patrick told the Associated Press: "It's a hoax -- and it's not funny."Unfortunately, it is funny. What isn't funny is now the Boston government is trying to prosecute the artist and the network instead of owning up to their own stupidity. The police now claim that they were "hoax" explosive devices. I don't think you can claim they are hoax explosive devices unless they were intended to look like explosive devices, which merely a cursory look at any of them shows that they weren't.
But it's much easier to blame others than to admit that you were wrong:
"It is outrageous, in a post 9/11 world, that a company would use this type of marketing scheme," Mayor Thomas Menino said. "I am prepared to take any and all legal action against Turner Broadcasting and its affiliates for any and all expenses incurred."And:
Rep. Ed Markey, a Boston-area congressman, said, "Whoever thought this up needs to find another job.""Scaring an entire region, tying up the T and major roadways, and forcing first responders to spend 12 hours chasing down trinkets instead of terrorists is marketing run amok," Markey, a Democrat, said in a written statement. "It would be hard to dream up a more appalling publicity stunt."
And:
"It had a very sinister appearance," [Massachusetts Attorney General Martha] Coakley told reporters. "It had a battery behind it, and wires."For heavens sake, don't let her inside a Radio Shack.
Agreed.Oh my God! Wires! And a battery! My question is: doesn't the city of Boston have any bomb experts on staff? I mean, it's not crazy for a layman to see an unidentified electronic device and imagine it could be a bomb. But wouldn't the first step be to call in a bomb squad to examine the device? And wouldn't it be obvious to anyone that knew anything about electronics that it's highly unlikely that a terrorist would put dozens of gratuitous LEDs on the front of a bomb?
Terrorism is a serious problem, and we should take prudent steps to to deal with it. But we also have to remember that terrorists' goal is to produce terror and get attention. When we're this panicky, we do the terrorists' job for them. Yesterday Osama bin Laden succeeded in snarling traffic and producing an avalanche of news coverage without lifting a finger.
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/02/2007 12:16:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: Aqua Teen Hunger Force, hoaxes, security
Although some workers benefit -- those who were paid the old minimum wage but are worth the new one to the employers -- others are pushed into unemployment, the underground economy or crime:Good intentions don't make for good legislation.
Because most increases in the minimum wage have been slight, their effects are difficult to disentangle from other factors that affect employment:
- The losers are therefore likely to lose more than the gainers gain; they are also likely to be poorer people.
- And poor families are disproportionately hurt by the rise in the price of fast foods and other goods produced with low-skilled labor because these families spend a relatively large fraction of their incomes on such goods.
- But a 40 percent increase would be too large to have no employment effect; about a tenth of the work force makes less than $7.25 an hour.
- Even defenders of minimum-wage laws must believe that beyond some point a higher minimum would cause unemployment, otherwise why don't they propose $10, or $15, or an even higher figure?
According to the U.S. Department of Labor, the median annual income of a U.S. worker is $32,140. Federal minimum wage is currently $5.85 an hour, or about $11,500 per year — just above the poverty line. Of the 76.5 million people paid by the hour in the United States in 2006, 2.2% make minimum wage or less. Here are some generalizations we can make about minimum wage workers:UPDATE (November 25, 2012): There has been an accumulation of evidence that a moderate minimum wage is a net benefit, improving both wages and employment in some cases (reference to The Economist, Nov. 24, 2012, p. 82, "Free exchange: The argument in the floor").
- Most minimum wage earners are young. While 2.2% of all hourly workers earn minimum wage or less, just 1.4% of workers over the age of 25 are paid at or below the Federal minimum wage. More than half (51.2%) of minimum wage workers are between 16 and 24 years old. Another 21.2% are between 25 and 34.
- Most minimum wage earners work in food service. Nearly two-thirds of those paid minimum wage (or less) are food service workers. Many of these people receive supplemental income in the form of tips, which the government does not track.
- Most minimum wage earners never attended college. Just 1.2% of college graduates are paid the minimum wage. If you only have a high school degree, you’re more likely (1.9%) to be paid minimum wage. Those without a high school degree are nearly three times as likely (3.7%) to earn minimum wage. 59.8% of all minimum wage workers have no advanced education.
- Finally, as you might expect, part-time workers are five times more likely to be paid the minimum wage than full-time workers.
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/02/2007 11:54:00 AM
2
comments
Labels: economics, law, minimum wage, politics
...even if violence is diminished, given the current winner-take-all attitude and sectarian animosities infecting the political scene, Iraqi leaders will be hard pressed to achieve sustained political reconciliation in the time frame of this Estimate.The NIE also says that Iran and Syria are "not likely to be a major driver of violence or the prospects for stability because of the self-sustaining character of Iraq's internal sectarian dynamics."
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/02/2007 11:50:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: politics
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/01/2007 12:44:00 PM
0
comments
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/01/2007 11:39:00 AM
1 comments
Labels: civil liberties, climate change, David Paszkiewicz, education, science
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/01/2007 09:12:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: Aqua Teen Hunger Force, hoaxes, security
Her proposal, SCR 1026, would specifically bar courts from being able to grant any injunctions or other legal relief if the question involves "the acknowledgement of God as the sovereign source of law, liberty or government." And that bar would remain in place whether the action were brought against the government as a whole or any state or local official.She goes on to demonstrate that she doesn't understand the First Amendment's Establishment Clause:
Johnson said she is unhappy that judges in other states have ruled that the words "under God" have to come out of the Pledge of Allegiance, and that a monument of the Ten Commandments had to be removed from an Alabama courthouse.and:"We don't want that," she said.
Johnson said she believes her measure would also bar challenges to prayer in school.
Johnson said it is not the function of the courts to decide when government officials have crossed the line between church and state. In fact, she said, there is no law separating the two."In the (federal) Constitution, what it means is that there is to be no state religion," she said.
"But we're supposed to have religion in everything -- the opportunity to have religion in everything," Johnson continued. "I want religion in government, I want my government to have a faith-based perspective."
"The courts do their own thing," Johnson said. "They're making up law out of how they feel about things. They're not following the Constitution."
It's not clear whether she even understands that she has no ability or authority to affect federal courts on this issue, though she could affect state courts. All of her comments are about federal issues, and she doesn't appear to be cognizant of Article 2, Section 12 in the Arizona Constitution, which contains even stricter constraints on separation of church and state than in the U.S. Constitution:
The liberty of conscience secured by the provisions of this constitution shall not be so construed as to excuse acts of licentiousness, or justify practices inconsistent with the peace and safety of the state. No public money or property shall be appropriated for or applied to any religious worship, exercise, or instruction, or to the support of any religious establishment. No religious qualification shall be required for any public office or employment, nor shall any person be incompetent as a witness or juror in consequence of his opinion on matters of religion, nor be questioned touching his religious belief in any court of justice to affect the weight of his testimony.(Hat tip to Dispatches from the Culture Wars.)
Posted by
Lippard
at
2/01/2007 08:07:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: Arizona, law, religion, Scientology

| Mean | 917.2 |
| Median | 811 |
| Mode | 746 |
| Standard Deviation | 296.35814 |
| Range | 1256 |
| Minimum | 482 |
| Maximum | 1738 |
| Sum | 132994 |
| Count | 145 |
Posted by
Einzige
at
1/31/2007 08:14:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: Arizona, housing bubble
Posted by
Lippard
at
1/31/2007 08:05:00 PM
1 comments
Labels: security
Posted by
Lippard
at
1/31/2007 04:28:00 PM
1 comments
Labels: Aqua Teen Hunger Force, security
Posted by
Lippard
at
1/31/2007 08:32:00 AM
3
comments
Labels: Arizona, gay marriage, John McCain, politics, religion
Posted by
Lippard
at
1/30/2007 07:43:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: technology
Posted by
Lippard
at
1/29/2007 07:13:00 PM
6
comments
Labels: Amway, Arizona, finance, Robert Kiyosaki, The Simple Dollar
Posted by
Lippard
at
1/29/2007 03:49:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: charitable giving, law, politics
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:12:22 -0800 (PST)I sent the following reply:
From: John Martin
Subject: Get a life
You are just as bad as the telemarketers that call you.
Just like a scummy attorney that profits from filing
frivolous lawsuits. You raise the cost of doing business
for companies, raise taxes by overburdening the courts,
and therefore raise the cost of goods for consumers in the
marketplace.
What do you care? You made a dollar.
Telemarketing is critical for the economy to function. The
wheels would stop turning if there were no phones or business
conducted on them.
The Federal and State do no call list is just another angle
for the Fed and State to make a buck.
Just ask yourself, why is it legal for politicians to contact
and harass millions of citizens with automated messages and
call people on the so called do not call list? So its OK for
them to fund raise and get re elected (profit) using
unscrupulous methods. But a legitimate business offering
legit goods or services is restricted.
Are there Marketers that take advantage of people yes. Like
any other business there are bad apples. But most offer legit
goods and services.
Does your mailbox get full of junk mail? Do you watch
commercials on TV? or even now at the movies? Why not sue
them? Junk Mail does more damage to the environment than
anything else. But the US post service make money on it so
that will never stop.
Screen you calls, that's what caller id is for, hangup on
automated messages and telemarketers. And stop with the lame
lawsuits. Do you really suffer any damages by listening to a
message or having a dialer hang up on you? Or are you just an
other greedy opportunist like you EVIL telemarketing
counterparts just out for a quick buck?
From: "James J. Lippard" [my email addr]For the record, I don't watch television commercials (thanks, TiVo!) and I'm also very opposed to spam (and much of my professional life in the Internet industry has been devoted to combatting it). We also don't go to see movies in the theater anymore except on rare occasion; we rent DVDs. I'm an advocate of permission-based marketing to individuals, not indiscriminate broadcast advertising.
To: John Martin
Subject: Re: Get a life
In-Reply-To: <400549.50780.qm@web62015.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
The difference, John, is that they are knowingly violating
the law, and I'm not. None of my lawsuits have been
frivolous, which is why I have a 100% record of success.
I'm only raising the cost of business for companies that are
blatantly breaking the law; my impact on the courts is
negligible--I always offer to settle out of court for the
minimum statutory amounts before filing a lawsuit, and I
always file in small claims which minimizes the paperwork.
The money I collect is specified as damages in the statutes,
and serves not only to compensate me for the violations but
to act as a deterrent to further violations. It has worked
pretty well--I don't get many such calls any more.
If you think the law is wrong, petition to have it changed.
But if you violate it, be prepared to get sued and to lose.
What's your interest that motivates you to send a nasty email
to someone you don't know? From your email address, I would
guess that you're in the satellite dish resale business,
which is well known for its sleazy violations of
telemarketing law.
Are you a regular violator of the TCPA, John?
BTW, I have a nice life. What kind of life do you have that
you seek enjoyment out of sending such an email as this?
Posted by
Lippard
at
1/28/2007 10:27:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: law, spam, technology, telemarketing
Posted by
Lippard
at
1/27/2007 09:35:00 PM
5
comments
Labels: Arizona, climate change, Heartland Institute, politics, religion, Scientology
Posted by
Lippard
at
1/27/2007 07:50:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: creationism, religion
Posted by
Lippard
at
1/27/2007 08:21:00 AM
2
comments
Labels: civil liberties, gay marriage, technology, telemarketing
Posted by
Lippard
at
1/25/2007 05:50:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: technology, travel
Posted by
Lippard
at
1/23/2007 08:05:00 PM
1 comments
Labels: creationism, psychics, Scientology, security, skepticism, spam, technology, UFOs
Posted by
Lippard
at
1/23/2007 07:47:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: politics
Posted by
Lippard
at
1/23/2007 08:49:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: David Paszkiewicz, education, politics, religion
We’ve warned you about them before on our website—but now they’re on a much more aggressive march all across America. No longer are they just staying in their classrooms or writing books and articles in the comfort of their offices. They are “the new atheists,” and they are aggressively going after your children, your liberties, and your faith!According to Ham, Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins are coming for your children, and the best way to stop them is to give money to AiG so that they can complete their museum.
...These atheists are not just publicity seekers. They are very serious about their mission. Dawkins, from England, was recently crusading across America to proclaim his atheism to newspapers, websites, and at public meetings.
Posted by
Lippard
at
1/22/2007 07:06:00 AM
1 comments
Labels: Answers in Genesis, atheism, creationism, religion, Richard Dawkins
Posted by
Lippard
at
1/21/2007 01:44:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: psychics, Sylvia Browne
LYING in an intensive-care ward is a world away from climbing Everest, but a connection will be drawn this spring when 45 scientists and 208 volunteers tackle the mountain to bring back information about oxygen deprivation. The reason they are going is that hypoxia (a lack of oxygen in cells, which can lead to death) is the one thing that links practically all patients in intensive-care wards—and there is no better place to study it than in the thin air of the world's highest mountain.The story describes the Xtreme Everest expedition, which will take 250 people up Mount Everest, setting up mobile labs at various elevations to study hypoxia. The volunteers will climb up to 5,300 meters, and 16 climber-scientists will ascend to the summit to become the first to have blood drawn at the top of the world's tallest mountain.
I'm always interested in the intersection of philosophy and information security, since the former was my field of undergraduate and graduate study, while the latter is my profession. The article briefly describes how Adam Barth is attempting to apply linear temporal logic to codify conditions of information transmission into rules that can be used by computers.A group of computer scientists at Stanford University, led by John Mitchell, has started to address the problem in a novel way. Instead of relying on rigid (and easily programmable) codes of what is and is not acceptable, Dr Mitchell and his colleagues Adam Barth and Anupam Datta have turned to a philosophical theory called contextual integrity. This theory acknowledges that people do not require complete privacy. They will happily share information with others as long as certain social norms are met. Only when these norms are contravened—for example, when your psychiatrist tells the personnel department all about your consultation—has your privacy been invaded. The team think contextual integrity can be used to express the conventions and laws surrounding privacy in the formal vernacular of a computer language.
Contextual integrity, which was developed by Helen Nissenbaum of New York University, relies on four classes of variable. These are the context of a flow of information, the capacities in which the individuals sending and receiving the information are acting, the types of information involved, and what she calls the “principle of transmission”.
Posted by
Lippard
at
1/21/2007 12:46:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: books, economics, philosophy, science, security, technology