William Dembski's Obsessive Complaints of Obsession
Dembski then dug the hole deeper, stating that this couldn't be the reason. Why not? Because he withdrew before Shallit's deposition was taken. He went on to challenge the ACLU and Shallit to release a transcript of the deposition. Unfortunately for Dembski, it was the defense that took the deposition, to make sure they would be prepared in case Shallit would be used as a witness--and the deposition (at least in the preliminary, uncorrected transcript) is already a public record.
Perhaps Dembski should work on responding to his critics, rather than accusing them of stalking him.
1 comment:
Ed Brayton has an update here, showing that Shallit didn't testify as a result of a motion from the defense:
http://www.stcynic.com/blog/archives/2005/11/update_on_dembski_and_shallit_1.php
Post a Comment