Happy 214th to the Bill of Rights
Posted by Lippard at 12/15/2005 07:37:00 PM 0 comments
Posted by Lippard at 12/15/2005 06:41:00 PM 0 comments
relying on Wikipedia presents numerous risks:But the authors don't seem to recognize that most of these risks apply to all published sources, not just Wikipedia or online sources. The reliability of sources on the Internet needs to be examined, just as the reliability of conventionally published sources needs to be examined. They also don't mention that volatility can be a benefit, reflecting rapid change as more or better information becomes available.* Accuracy: You cannot be sure which information is accurate and which is not. Misinformation has a negative value; even if you get it for free, you've paid too much.
* Motives: You cannot know the motives of the contributors to an article. They may be altruists, political or commercial opportunists, practical jokers, or even vandals (WP: ``Wikipedia:Most_vandalized_pages'').
* Uncertain Expertise: Some contributors exceed their expertise and supply speculations, rumors, hearsay, or incorrect information. It is difficult to determine how qualified an article's contributors are; the revision histories often identify them by pseudonyms, making it hard to check credentials and sources.
* Volatility: Contributions and corrections may be negated by future contributors. One of the co-authors of this column found it disconcerting that he had the power to independently alter the Wikipedia article about himself and negate the others' opinions. Volatility creates a conundrum for citations: Should you cite the version of the article that you read (meaning that those who follow your link may miss corrections and other improvements), or the latest version (which may differ significantly from the article you saw)?
* Coverage: Voluntary contributions largely represent the interests and knowledge of a self-selected set of contributors. They are not part of a careful plan to organize human knowledge. Topics that interest the young and Internet-savvy are well-covered, while events that happened ``before the Web'' may be covered inadequately or inaccurately, if at all. More is written about current news than about historical knowledge.
* Sources: Many articles do not cite independent sources. Few articles contain citations to works not digitized and stored in the open Internet.
Posted by Lippard at 12/15/2005 06:20:00 PM 1 comments
Labels: Wikipedia
Posted by Lippard at 12/15/2005 04:21:00 PM 0 comments
Posted by Lippard at 12/15/2005 03:59:00 PM 0 comments
Labels: War on Christmas
Posted by Lippard at 12/15/2005 03:45:00 PM 3 comments
Labels: Richard Sternberg affair
Posted by Lippard at 12/13/2005 06:22:00 PM 0 comments
Posted by Lippard at 12/13/2005 09:40:00 AM 1 comments
Indigo Children are the current generation being born today and most of those who are 8 years old or younger. They are different. They have very unique characteristics that set them apart from previous generations of children. The name itself indicates the Life Color they carry in their auras and is indicative of the Third Eye Chakra, which represents intuition and psychic ability. These are the children who are often rebellious to authority, nonconformist, extremely emotionally and sometimes physically sensitive or fragile, highly talented or academically gifted and often metaphysically gifted as well, usually intuitive, very often labeled ADD, either very empathic and compassionate OR very cold and callous, and are wise beyond their years. Does this sound like yourself or your child?Here's a story originally from the Orange County Register about some "indigo children." How hard would it be for an undisciplined, rebellious child to set up the "orange incident" to impress some gullible parents? (Thanks to several people on the SKEPTIC mailing list for the references.)
Posted by Lippard at 12/13/2005 07:40:00 AM 1 comments
Posted by Lippard at 12/12/2005 05:18:00 PM 0 comments