your funhouse mirror through a cloudy lens view of the world is endlessly entertaining-
Odd, I was under the impression you weren't having any fun. Maybe it's Pinker's hair that put you in the carnival mood.
I don't think a charge of distortion or fuzzy thinking is exactly accurate. Though I am rather inclined to acknowledge the limits of human reasoning and knowledge. Perhaps its the insistence on real standards of skepticism instead of a pre-ordained program of attitudes and assumptions, not to mention platitudes, that causes the misunderstanding.
You know, I have been accused of being too nit-picky on atheist-skeptic blogs in the past.
Jim,
ReplyDeleteI find much to disagree with in your assessment of Pinker in this post.
:-)
I used Steven Pinker's voice for Professor Lockheart when I read my niece the second Harry Potter book. Other than that he's pretty useless.
ReplyDeleteThere, does that satisfy you, Einzige?
olvlzl,
ReplyDeleteIn the sense that you and your funhouse mirror through a cloudy lens view of the world is endlessly entertaining--yes, I am quite satisfied.
Oops. I fucked up the verb in that sentence--and just after my English lesson from olvlzl, too.
ReplyDeleteHow embarassing!
Great! Now I remembered that I've been meaning to read her book on Spinoza.
ReplyDeleteyour funhouse mirror through a cloudy lens view of the world is endlessly entertaining-
ReplyDeleteOdd, I was under the impression you weren't having any fun. Maybe it's Pinker's hair that put you in the carnival mood.
I don't think a charge of distortion or fuzzy thinking is exactly accurate. Though I am rather inclined to acknowledge the limits of human reasoning and knowledge. Perhaps its the insistence on real standards of skepticism instead of a pre-ordained program of attitudes and assumptions, not to mention platitudes, that causes the misunderstanding.
You know, I have been accused of being too nit-picky on atheist-skeptic blogs in the past.